Hounsy wrote:
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/939830-leafs-talk-should-reporter-have-contacted-james-reimers-mom-about-injury
Also listened to radio talk of the whole going to Reimer's mother for the scoop issue and one thing is clear the "Media" will be biased when it comes to protecting their own as the support for this reporter is astonishing.
I think of my Mother in this situation and she would likely spill the beans as well and then when she finds out she shouldn't have she would feel absolutely horrible. Sorry I don't care if the media thinks it has a right to know the details of an injury it still is a despicable to weasel the info out of a players mother.
and to think I have to side with Milbury on something. ewwwwwe
Frankly the media gets villainized too often and in this case, they're not to blame. They had a right to the truth and sought it out when the Leafs stubbornly (and frankly, unnecessarily) went into DEFCON-2 regarding Reimer's injury. First they said it was whiplash and not a concussion. Then they said it was whiplash with concussion-like symptoms. Then they BACKTRACKED and said it was the age-old "upper body injury." When they're willfully and knowingly throwing out misinformation like that, that's tantamount to thumbing their noses at the media and IMO they flat-out asked to be outsmarted on this, which they were.
If they had just come out and admitted the truth right off the bat, none of this would've happened. But for them to act all butthurt because a journalist rightfully went to a source and got important information the team was being ridiculously covert about is patently absurd. The guy did his fucking job, nothing more.
I'm not saying every hockey injury has to be reported, this isn't the NFL and gamblers don't control the brass. But to purposely throw out misinformation about a topic that rightfully has a lot of fans concerned like this is pure hubris, and I for one am delighted to see Burke and Wilson get bitten right in the ass for such antics.