Fogghorn wrote:
Perry has made a pretty open and clear apology and is seeking help for alcoholism. Which now raises another question, can you fire a player when they are seeking help for drug or alcoholism? It doesn't mention he's entered the NHLPA substance abuse program perhaps he's doing it through other options on his own? Its not a real good look for the Hawks imo for firing someone who needs help.
https://www.canucksdaily.com/MAJOR-Core ... ase-306125It depends on the severity of the incident that took place in Columbus. A fireable offense is a fireable offense, and while I'm usually not someone who sings the praises of Corey Perry I'm happy to see him immediately take ownership and responsibility for his failure.
We still don't know the specifics of what went down with Jim Montgomery when he was with Dallas, but we know that too had something to do with alcohol. He was fired, rightfully so, and sought professional help. He worked his way back up the ranks and is once again a successful head coach in the NHL. IMO Perry can and should be given another chance once he's cleared.
I don't for one moment feel good about being in a position where I'm actually defending a slimebucket organization like the Blackhawks, and frankly they needed to work a TON harder to dispel these silly rumors the moment they cropped up, but I don't think they're out of line for terminating his contract.
If you want to see a player dismissal that was as smug and self-serving as it gets, I'd cite the release of Mike Richards by the Kings. Dean Lombardi and his crocodile tears went out of their way to paint Richards' actions as a betrayal, yet right around that time had no issue whatsoever violating NHL rules to let Slava Voynov practice with the team. And in an interview years after the Kings shitcanned him Lombardi STILL thought he was the aggrieved party.